I agree that these two features need to be working well and consistently. I'm ok with changing the location of the fork option, although I have to say that it seems to make more sense to keep it

On which pages? Does the Forker option under the "Options" menu have the effect you expect? I am toying with the idea of switching the forker button next to the icon to a link to the source material

1) Forking: Over the last few days I find that the forker button no longer works to fork pages with content re-use. This is a problem for me on both Safari and Chrome browsers. 2) During the workshop

The box I mentioned was meant so that people can add interactive content that has no reason to print up in PDFs. We have several PDF output options including a combined PDF and a zip file of PDFs of

Do we have a box that will let us separatw and print up PDFs? -- Athena Kashyap http://www.athenakashyap.com

Due to request, we added a new container (box) to the LibreTexts libraries. This is the BoxInteractive and will be a simple box that interactive material can be thrown into on a page. It helps to

It is a good idea. We were discussing making that explicit in the code earlier this year, but got sidetracked. There is nothing stopping you from doing this since the molecules are stored in ascii

If I can jump on this discussion bringing up a related issue that I've been struggling with... Regarding accessing files with JS code, I'm wondering if it would be a good idea to save on LibreTexts

When you drag and drop files to a page, they are added as attachements and are given fixed URLs that can be wired into your JS code.

I am coding JavaScript based games to embed into the textbook that I remixed and I would like to include sounds when the player gets it correct or incorrect. To do that it is best to save a MP3 or

Nope. We will go through the pain of dual publishing formatting before limiting the interactivity of the online experience.

Those sound like good solutions. I was just thinking that it's that sad that we're dumbing-down the beautiful visuals of our online textbooks because we're worried about what the print versions are

That is possible. We have done something like that for Butte's Human Bio book. We are working on a system that will automatically throw QR codes over video images on PDF/physics text so that students

Similar question: Is there some kind of conditional formatting tag that lets us print alternate graphics or information different from the online version? Like the print version would automatically

We can created a new box for you that will not break the box over different pages, but if you make the box bigger than a page, I am unsure what will happen. We used to not allow this, but

Hi All, I had been embedding videos in "examples" until I realized they got goofed when they were printed, and so I stopped.. Can we embed them in the new image template? and will that stop them from

Delete it. It is old code that we have hardwired elsewhere.

On the bottom of some of my older pages I have {{template.DefinitionList()}} I went through the templates and could not find it, and so am removing it. Does anyone know what it did?.. and why I was

Arnie: That is the way we intended to organize the ancillary materials sections. Any much of the organization in chemistry's ancillary materials is formulated in this way. We can organize in

I am going to chime in here a bit. We ran a workshop last week in Fayetteville and the chair of our biology department attended it. Afterwards he sent me an email, and I do not feel at liberty to